全州提案 · 2026 年 11 月 3 日加州普選

提案 40:對某些特定的納稅人徵收一次性稅。

這張卡片上的官方文字逐字取自州務卿選民指南的官方翻譯(快速參考指南)。譯本中沒有的文字以英文顯示。

倡議憲法修正案和法規。 [1] · 主題: 稅收

對某些資產超過 10 億美元的納稅人徵收5%的稅;收入主要用於醫療保健。將該收入排除在憲法的關於學校經費和支出限額的規定之外。 [1]

投贊成票的意思

投票贊成本議案表示:州政府將向億萬富豪課徵一次性稅款,金額相當於其財富的 5%。 [1]

投反對票的意思

投票反對本議案表示:州政府將不會向億萬富豪課徵相當於其財富 5% 的一次性稅款。 [1]

官方支持論點

對提案 40 投贊成投票,向億萬富豪課稅。Trump 為了替億萬富豪減稅,大幅削減醫療經費資金,導致超過一百萬名 California 居民失去醫療保障,另有數百萬人的健康保險保費增加 1 倍。是時候讓億萬富豪公平分擔稅負,別再讓中產階級買單。 [1]

官方反對論點

提案 40 是一項有缺陷的一次性課稅方案,將傷害經濟、衝擊州預算,還存在漏洞,使所有 California 居民都可能面臨難以負擔的稅負,卻無助於降低醫療費用。沒有保障措施,也沒有問責機制。請與 California 教師協會、California 醫學會、California 兒童醫院協會、California 職業消防員協會、California 州建築與營造業工會理事會,以及民主黨和共和黨人士共同反對提案 40。 [1]

支持者

US Senator Bernie Sanders; SEIU United Healthcare Workers West [1]

反對者

California Primary Care Association; California School Boards Association; California Taxpayers Association [1]

兩方論點都逐字取自官方選民指南的摘要頁,並以相同版面呈現。ThinkBallot 不會編輯或排名。 閱讀完整的論點和反駁。

財政影響

通過對億萬富翁徵收財富稅,在幾年內可臨時增加數百億美元的收入。來自億萬富翁的所得稅可能每年持續下降不到10億美元。 [1]

立法分析師的分析 (無黨派立法分析師的完整說明) 官方英文原文

這份分析的官方翻譯在州務卿的本提案 PDF 中。以下是英文原文。

BACKGROUND California Is Home to Many Billionaires. Several of the wealthiest people in the world live in California. Wealth is the value of all the things a person owns. Wealth is different from income, which is how much a person earns in a set period of time, like one year. A person’s wealth typically is measured by their net worth. A person’s net worth is the value of all the things they own, like stocks, businesses, or other investments, minus their debts. California is home to a few hundred people with net worth over $1 billion, often called billionaires. Many of these billionaires gained their wealth as executives or investors in California technology companies. Health Care Is a Major Category of State Spending. The state and federal government spend over $200 billion per year on state health care programs. Most state health care spending is for Medi-Cal, the state’s health insurance program for low-income people. State spending also supports public health programs, mental health care, and drug and alcohol treatment. PROPOSAL Establishes One-Time Wealth Tax on Billionaires. Under Proposition 40, billionaires who were residents of California on January 1, 2026 would have to pay a one-time state tax equal to 5 percent of their net worth. The tax would be due in 2027. Taxpayers would have the option to spread the payments over five years but would have to pay more to do so. Real estate, pensions, and retirement accounts generally would be excluded from the tax. Most of the Money Must Be Spent on Health Care. The state would decide how and when to spend the money from the wealth tax, but it would have to be spent on certain types of services. Ninety percent of the money would have to be spent on health care services for the public. The rest would have to be spent on education, food assistance, and administration of the wealth tax. Existing rules in the State Constitution that limit spending and require the state to spend a certain amount on schools and community colleges would not apply to this money. FISCAL EFFECTS Temporary State Revenue Increase From Wealth Tax. The state probably would collect tens of billions of dollars from the wealth tax. This temporary increase in state tax collections would be spread across several years. Exactly when and how much the state would collect is very hard to predict for many reasons. For example, it is hard to know what actions billionaires would take to reduce the amount of tax they pay. Also, much of the wealth is based on stock prices, which are always changing. Possible Ongoing Decrease in State Income Tax Revenues. California billionaires, like all those earning money in the state, currently pay state taxes on their annual income. Billionaires may respond to a new wealth tax in ways that reduce their income tax payments. For example, some billionaires may decide to leave California. The income taxes they currently pay to the state also would go away. These responses probably would reduce state revenues by less than $1 billion per year. This could mean less money for the state’s General Fund, which is the account that pays for most public services, including education, health care, and prisons. State Costs to Administer the Wealth Tax. The state would have costs to determine how much wealth tax is owed and to collect tax payments. These costs could be tens of millions of dollars per year for several years. These costs would be paid from the new wealth tax revenues.
[2]

詢問提案 40

回答只根據上面的官方文字,附上引文,並在你看到之前由 Bias Buster 檢查。

建議問題的回答在完成經檢查的翻譯後會以中文顯示。其他回答是英文的,並引用英文官方文字。

由 AI 模型根據官方文字撰寫,並經 Bias Buster 檢查。引文均為官方文字。

← 所有提案

社群討論將在選舉後開放。