全州提案 · 2026 年 11 月 3 日加州普選

提案 4:廢除禁止公共資金資助選舉活動的禁令。

這張卡片上的官方文字逐字取自州務卿選民指南的官方翻譯(快速參考指南)。譯本中沒有的文字以英文顯示。

立法法規。 [1] · 主題: 選舉 競選經費

廢除禁止州和當地政府向候選人競選活動提供公共資金的禁令。公共資金方案不得使用專項教育、交通或公共安全資金。 [1]

投贊成票的意思

投票贊成本議案表示:州政府及地方政府將可設立以公共資金補助公職候選人競選活動的計畫,但可使用的公共資金來源、使用方式及補助對象均須受到限制。 [1]

投反對票的意思

投票反對本議案表示:州政府及大多數地方政府將繼續不得設立以公共資金補助公職候選人競選活動的計畫。 [1]

官方支持論點

請對提案 4 投贊成投票。California 是唯一禁止以公共資金資助競選活動的州,其他 49 州的社區都享有這項權利。特殊利益團體希望保留這項禁令,以維護自身權勢。提案 4 將廢除這項禁令。設有嚴格的納稅人保障措施。請投贊成投票:選舉應靠實力贏得,而非靠金錢買下。 [1]

官方反對論點

提案 4 允許政治人物用您繳納的稅款,用作資金資助他們攻擊對手的競選活動。提案 4 既未限制可取得納稅人資金的候選人人數,也未限制他們可取得的金額。更糟的是,提案 4 允許特殊利益資金介入政治。請否決提案 4。 [1]

支持者

League of Women Voters of CA; California Nurses Association; Mental Health Advocacy; Social Security Works; Consumer Watchdog [1]

反對者

California Taxpayers Assn; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn; Family Business Assn of California; United Latinos Action [1]

兩方論點都逐字取自官方選民指南的摘要頁,並以相同版面呈現。ThinkBallot 不會編輯或排名。 閱讀完整的論點和反駁。

財政影響

州政府每年持續產生數十萬美元的成本,用於公平政治實踐委員會回答州和當地政府有關公共競選資金方案的問題。 [1]

立法分析師的分析 (無黨派立法分析師的完整說明) 官方英文原文

這份分析的官方翻譯在州務卿的本提案 PDF 中。以下是英文原文。

BACKGROUND The Political Reform Act. Many people, groups, and businesses spend money to support or oppose candidates for public office and ballot measures. California's Political Reform Act sets rules for how money can be used in politics and requires public reporting of political spending. These rules apply to state and local candidates, ballot measures, and other public officials, but not to federal candidates or officials. (Federal law establishes campaign finance and reporting requirements for federal offices.) The Political Reform Act has been updated by voters over the years. Ban on Public Funds to Pay for Campaigns. The Political Reform Act bans the use of public funds for political candidates' campaigns. This ban applies to most elected offices at the state level and local level. (This ban does not apply to city office elections in certain charter cities. Los Angeles, San Francisco, Long Beach, Oakland, and Berkeley are current examples of charter cities that provide public funds to certain campaigns.) Entities That Oversee Campaign Finance Laws. California's campaign finance laws are administered by the Fair Political Practices Commission and the California Secretary of State. State law requires people and groups to report how much money they give, receive, and spend on political campaigns. This information is available to the public on the Secretary of State's website. The Fair Political Practices Commission enforces and interprets the Political Reform Act. The Fair Political Practices Commission reviews the finance reports and can fine candidates and donors who break the law. The Fair Political Practices Commission issues guidance based on its interpretation of the Political Reform Act. PROPOSAL Lifts Ban on Use of Public Funds to Pay for Candidates' Campaigns. Proposition 4 lifts the ban on using public funds for political candidates' campaigns. Removing the ban allows state and local governments to create public campaign financing programs in the future if they wish. Proposition 4 does not create a public campaign finance system for the state or local governments directly. Sets Rules for Future State and Local Public Campaign Finance Programs. Proposition 4 sets broad rules for future state and local public campaign finance programs but leaves many key design decisions to future state and local decision makers. Proposition 4 limits which public funds can be used for campaigns, who can receive the funds, and how the funds can be spent in any future public campaign finance program. For example, money meant for education, transportation, or public safety cannot be used for campaigns. Candidates can only receive public funds if they show broad-based support in their district and agree to spending limits and other program rules. Public funds cannot be used for legal defense fees or fines, or to repay a candidate's personal campaign loan. State and local governments can design and implement their own programs within the broad rules set by Proposition 4. Fair Political Practices Commission Would Issue Guidance on Public Campaign Finance Programs. Proposition 4 specifies that the Fair Political Practices Commission is not required to administer or enforce local public campaign finance programs. Rather, state and local government officials could ask the Fair Political Practices Commission for guidance on how to create public campaign finance programs consistent with Proposition 4. FISCAL EFFECTS Costs of Possible Public Campaign Finance Programs Depend on Future Decisions. Proposition 4 does not create a public campaign finance program. However, it allows state and local governments to create such programs in the future. The cost of these programs could be significant for governments that choose to create them. The total cost would depend on which governments created such programs and how those programs were designed. Minor State Costs to Support State and Local Governments Considering Public Campaign Finance Programs. If voters approve Proposition 4, state and local government officials likely would ask the Fair Political Practices Commission for guidance on creating public campaign finance programs under the Political Reform Act. This likely would require the Fair Political Practices Commission to hire more legal staff to help answer these questions. As a result, state costs would be a few hundred thousand dollars each year. This amount is much less than one-tenth of 1 percent (0.1 percent) of the state's total General Fund budget. (The General Fund is the account the state uses to pay for most public services, including education, health care, and prisons.)
[2]

詢問提案 4

回答只根據上面的官方文字,附上引文,並在你看到之前由 Bias Buster 檢查。

建議問題的回答在完成經檢查的翻譯後會以中文顯示。其他回答是英文的,並引用英文官方文字。

由 AI 模型根據官方文字撰寫,並經 Bias Buster 檢查。引文均為官方文字。

← 所有提案

社群討論將在選舉後開放。