全州提案 · 2026 年 11 月 3 日加州普選

提案 3:通過延長現行針對高收入群體的稅收向學校與醫療保健提供永久資金。

這張卡片上的官方文字逐字取自州務卿選民指南的官方翻譯(快速參考指南)。譯本中沒有的文字以英文顯示。

倡議憲法修正案。 [1] · 主題: 稅收 教育 醫療保健

將年收入超過 371,000 美元 (每年根據通貨膨脹率進行調整) 的個人現行、經選民批准的稅率永久化。將稅收收入分配給公共教育。 [1]

投贊成票的意思

投票贊成本議案表示:自 2012 年起實施、針對高所得者的所得稅加徵措施將永久施行,不再於 2031 年到期。 [1]

投反對票的意思

投票反對本議案表示:自 2012 年起實施、針對高所得者的所得稅加徵措施將於 2031 年到期。 [1]

官方支持論點

提案 3 保障我們的學校及醫療服務,不會增加您的稅負。提案 3 維持最富有的 2% 人口在過去 15 年間適用的現行稅率,防止百萬富翁及億萬富豪獲得大幅減稅,並要求落實嚴格的問責及審計,確保學校資金真正用於課堂教學。投贊成票。 [1]

官方反對論點

California 居民已承擔全國最高的所得稅、銷售稅及汽油稅,生活成本也居全國之冠。提案 3 將臨時性的所得稅措施永久化,但 Sacramento 卻在失敗的計畫上浪費數十億美元,而非優先處理選民關切的事項。別再獎勵失敗。在讓稅制永久化之前,應先解決支出問題。反對提案 3。 [1]

支持者

California Teachers Association; CA School Nurses Organization; California State PTA; Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA [1]

反對者

California Taxpayers Association; Family Business Association of California; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce [1]

兩方論點都逐字取自官方選民指南的摘要頁,並以相同版面呈現。ThinkBallot 不會編輯或排名。 閱讀完整的論點和反駁。

財政影響

對高收入群體的臨時加稅將在 2031 年到期,通過將其改為永久稅率,保障每年 50 億到 150 億美元的州政府所得稅。 [1]

立法分析師的分析 (無黨派立法分析師的完整說明) 官方英文原文

這份分析的官方翻譯在州務卿的本提案 PDF 中。以下是英文原文。

BACKGROUND Most State Money Comes From the Income Tax. The income tax is the state’s largest tax. It pays for most spending from the state’s main operating account, the General Fund. The General Fund is the account the state uses to pay for most public services, including education, health care, and prisons. The tax applies to most types of income, such as salaries, wages, interest, and profits from the sale of stocks, property, and other investments. The income tax rate starts out low and gradually goes up for taxpayers with higher incomes. For example, a married couple pays a 1 percent tax on the first $21,000 of income, a 2 percent tax on income between $21,000 and $50,000, and a 4 percent tax on income between $50,000 and $80,000. Prior Voter-Approved Tax Increases. Voters approved Proposition 30 in 2012 to temporarily increase income tax rates on high-income taxpayers. In 2016, voters approved Proposition 55 to extend these higher rates until 2030. The top 2 percent of California taxpayers pay these higher rates. These taxpayers pay about half of all state income taxes. How Does the State Spend Its Money? This year, the state plans to spend about $250 billion from the General Fund to pay for services to the public. About half of this spending is for schools, community colleges, and the state’s public universities. (The State Constitution sets a minimum spending level for schools and community colleges.) About another one-third of state spending is for health and human services programs, mainly for the state’s low-income health insurance program, Medi-Cal. The rest goes mostly to prisons, courts, and other state services. PROPOSAL Proposition 3 makes the higher income tax rates established by Proposition 30 permanent instead of letting them expire in 2031. Figure 1 shows what income tax rates would be if this measure passes and what they would be if it is rejected. FISCAL EFFECTS Proposition 3 Would Bring in Between $5 Billion and $15 Billion Each Year. The amount of money brought in by Proposition 3 will go up and down a lot from year to year. This is because much of the revenue comes from taxing income that is closely tied to the stock market, which is always changing. In a weak year, the proposition might bring in around $5 billion in revenue to the state. In a strong year, the proposition might bring in $15 billion in revenue to the state. In most years, revenue would be in between these amounts. Funding for Education and Other Programs. Proposition 3 results in funding for education and other programs. Roughly 40 percent of the funding would go to schools and community colleges. The rest would go to other state programs. Part of this amount would be set aside in budget reserves the state could use to fund these programs when revenues decline.
[2]

詢問提案 3

回答只根據上面的官方文字,附上引文,並在你看到之前由 Bias Buster 檢查。

建議問題的回答在完成經檢查的翻譯後會以中文顯示。其他回答是英文的,並引用英文官方文字。

由 AI 模型根據官方文字撰寫,並經 Bias Buster 檢查。引文均為官方文字。

← 所有提案

社群討論將在選舉後開放。