全州提案 · 2026 年 11 月 3 日加州普選

提案 38:授權用於免疫醫學研究的債券。

這張卡片上的官方文字逐字取自州務卿選民指南的官方翻譯(快速參考指南)。譯本中沒有的文字以英文顯示。

倡議法規。 [1] · 主題: 債券 醫學研究

授權 84 億美元的一般責任債券,用於免疫和免疫療法研究,一半分配給隸屬 California 大學的一家非營利醫學研究機構,另一半分配給研究撥款。 [1]

投贊成票的意思

投票贊成本議案表示:州政府將可舉債 84 億美元,支持 California 研究機構及大學進行免疫學與免疫療法的醫學研究。 [1]

投反對票的意思

投票反對本議案表示:州政府將不得舉債 84 億美元,支持 California 研究機構及大學進行免疫學與免疫療法的醫學研究。 [1]

官方支持論點

支持提案 38,就是支持能挽救生命的免疫學研究,以治癒及預防癌症、心臟病、Alzheimer 等疾病。設有嚴格的問責機制,包括獨立審計。規定處方藥須提供 20% 的折扣。制度設計旨在確保納稅人無須負擔費用。支持提案 38,可能挽救您及摯愛之人的生命。Alzheimer 協會、Michael J. Fox Pakinson's 研究基金會呼籲支持提案 38!www.YESon38.com [1]

官方反對論點

California 應繼續支持生物醫學研究,但提案 38 的做法並不恰當。此案將使納稅人承擔長達數十年的新增債券債務,同時限制 California 因應健康領域優先事項變化的彈性。研究資金應透過正常的預算程序安排,而非由公民選票決定。 [1]

支持者

Michael J. Fox Foundation; Alzheimer’s Los Angeles; Kidney Cancer Assoc; American Nurses Assoc\CA [1]

反對者

Robert M Kaplan Ph.D. [1]

兩方論點都逐字取自官方選民指南的摘要頁,並以相同版面呈現。ThinkBallot 不會編輯或排名。 閱讀完整的論點和反駁。

財政影響

州政府的成本每年增加 5 到 6 億美元,持續大約 20 年,用於償還研究債券,如果資助的研究帶來收入,則用來抵扣部份或所有成本。 [1]

立法分析師的分析 (無黨派立法分析師的完整說明) 官方英文原文

這份分析的官方翻譯在州務卿的本提案 PDF 中。以下是英文原文。

BACKGROUND Medical Research and Development (R&D) Is a Multi- Stage Process. The first stage of this process is basic research, which focuses on discovering new knowledge about how the human body works. The next stage is applied and clinical research, which aims to develop and test treatments for specific diseases. Universities do most of the basic research, while companies do most of the applied and clinical research. The third R&D stage is to have regulators review new treatments to make sure they are safe and effective. If a new treatment is approved, then it may be used on patients. Most R&D projects do not make it through all of these stages. Medical R&D Is Funded in Various Ways. Funding for medical R&D in the United States totaled about $300 billion in 2023. Companies and government agencies (such as the National Institutes of Health) are the major funding sources for R&D nationally and in California. Beyond these funding sources, California voters have approved two ballot measures— Proposition 71 (2004) and Proposition 14 (2020)— giving the state authority to issue general obligation bonds to fund specified medical research. Combined, the two measures allowed the state to issue $8.5 billion in bonds for stem cell research. Bonds are a way for the state to borrow money, then repay it with interest over time. A general obligation bond is typically repaid from the state General Fund. (The General Fund is the account the state uses to pay for most public services, including education, health care, and prisons.) For more information about bonds, see “Overview of State Bond Debt” later in this guide. PROPOSAL New Bond for Specified Medical Research. Proposition 38 allows the state to issue an $8.4 billion general obligation bond for research in immunology and immunotherapy. Immunology is the study of the body’s immune system and how it protects the body from abnormal cells and other causes of disease. Immunotherapy develops treatments that help the immune system fight diseases more effectively. The measure requires that at least $4.2 billion of the bond funds be used for immunology research on cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. No more than 2 percent of total bond funds may be used for state administrative costs. Payments on the bond would come from the state General Fund. Supports a Research Institute. About half of the bond funds would go to a research institute specializing in immunology and immunotherapy. The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) would select the institute. The selected institute must meet several criteria, including criteria related to its size, funding, and collaboration with a University of California (UC) campus. The institute would use the bond funds for research. Each year, the institute must issue a public report on its activities and have an independent financial audit. Supports Research Grants. A council would give out the other half of bond funds as competitive research grants focused on immunology and immunotherapy. The council would consist of representatives from 7 UC campuses and 10 to 15 other universities and nonprofit research institutions in California. The council would set research priorities and select grant recipients from among its member organizations. Similar to the institute, the council would have public reporting and audit requirements. Requires 10 Percent of Revenue From Discoveries First Be Used to Repay the State. Proposition 38 requires that the institute, in consultation with CDPH, try to generate the most revenue possible from the funded research. (Research, for example, could lead to the development of a new medical treatment.) Ten percent of any revenue generated must be given to the state. This revenue must first go into the state General Fund until it repays the cost of the research bond (the amount borrowed plus the interest). Any additional revenue would be used for future immunology and immunotherapy research. Has Two Other Notable Provisions. Requires Purchases From California Suppliers. Grant recipients must buy at least half of their goods and services from California suppliers when reasonably possible. Requires California Patient Discount. Any treatment developed through funded research and sold in California must generally be offered at a 20 percent discount. FISCAL EFFECTS Increased State Cost of $500 Million to $600 Million Annually for About 20 Years to Repay the Bond. The state General Fund cost to repay the bond would be $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years. The annual cost would be about one-quarter of 1 percent (0.25 percent) of the state’s total General Fund budget. Since the state has to pay interest on the money it borrows, the total cost of the bond would be about 10 percent more (after adjusting for inflation) than if the state paid up-front with money it already has. Potential State Revenue From Research Discoveries. The state could receive revenue from research funded by Proposition 38. The amount of revenue is uncertain but could be significant. It would depend on how many research projects lead to marketable treatments and how much money any given treatment generates. The timing of these revenues and how long it would take to offset the state’s bond cost is also uncertain, but could take decades. Potential Indirect Fiscal Effects. Proposition 38 likely would have some indirect fiscal effects, particularly on costs for state health programs (such as Medi-Cal, which pays for health care for low-income Californians). For example, if the funded research leads to new medical treatments, the average cost of patient care could either increase or decrease. As a result, the overall effect on program costs is uncertain.
[2]

詢問提案 38

回答只根據上面的官方文字,附上引文,並在你看到之前由 Bias Buster 檢查。

建議問題的回答在完成經檢查的翻譯後會以中文顯示。其他回答是英文的,並引用英文官方文字。

由 AI 模型根據官方文字撰寫,並經 Bias Buster 檢查。引文均為官方文字。

← 所有提案

社群討論將在選舉後開放。